ArticleBMC cancer2026
Postoperative feeding practices and nutritional intake in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing surgery with flap tissue transfer reconstruction: a scoping review.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSurgery with flap reconstruction is commonly utilised in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC). Following surgery, patients are made nil-by-mouth (NBM) and receive enteral tube feeding until they can recommence oral intake. Recent reviews have focussed on whether ‘early oral feeding’ (EOF) as part of enhanced recovery after surgery is beneficial. Limited literature has focussed on how patients are transitioned from tube to oral intake and nutritional implications. This review aims to map the evidence on postoperative feeding practices and nutritional intake of patients with HNC undergoing flap surgery.
methodsTitles, abstracts and subsequent full-text articles were screened from six databases: Embase, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL, Web of Science and grey literature by two independent researchers who both extracted data. A third reviewer was consulted when required. Inclusion criteria: all articles reporting on postoperative feeding practices in HNC flap surgery (RCTs, observational studies, case reports/series, guidelines). Findings were synthesised and presented using a narrative description approach.
resultsAfter searching 5093 citations and 405 full-texts, 36 articles were included. Enteral feeding tubes were either intraoperative nasogastric tube or gastrostomy pre-, intra- or postoperatively with feeds ideally commencing within 24 h of surgery. Gastrostomy placement was informed by disease, treatment and socio-demographic factors including age, tumour stage/site, prior/adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery extent. The timing/type to oral feeding was mainly surgeon-led ± speech and language therapy (SLT) and varied from postoperative day 1 (sterile water ± fluids ± smooth puree ± solid/semi-solid diet) to postoperative day 20 (fluids progressing to soft diet). EOF was defined as ≤5days and delayed/traditional feeding as >5days or after a 6–12 day nil-by-mouth period. Nutritional adequacy was mainly assessed by dietitians or nurses and thresholds varied between 60 and 100% of estimated nutritional requirements.
conclusionPostoperative feeding practices in HNC flap surgery vary and are associated with unit culture and clinician preference. Further prospective studies are required to identify factors associated with optimal timing and adequacy of oral feeding and exploration of clinician perceptions/practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.