ArticleBMC surgery2026
Reliability and reproducibility of the STAB classification compared with Neer and AO classifications for proximal humerus fracture-dislocations: a retrospective cohort study of 57 patients.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProximal humerus fracture-dislocations represent a challenging injury pattern with high complication rates. Current classification systems, including Neer and AO, have limitations in guiding treatment decisions for Neer type VI injuries. This study introduces and validates the STAB classification system, comparing its reliability and reproducibility with established classifications.
methodsA retrospective cohort study of 57 patients with Neer type VI proximal humerus fracture-dislocations treated between January 2018 and December 2024 was conducted. Four observers with different experience levels independently classified all cases using AO, Neer, and STAB systems at two time points (2 weeks apart). Inter-observer and intra-observer agreements were assessed using Cohen’s kappa coefficients. Clinical outcomes including operation time, fracture healing time, Constant-Murley scores, and complication rates were compared among STAB subtypes.
resultsThe STAB classification demonstrated higher reliability (inter-observer kappa = 0.94) and reproducibility (intra-observer kappa = 0.95) compared to AO (0.86 and 0.89) and Neer (0.83 and 0.92) classifications (all p < 0.05). Among 57 patients (Type T: 22, Type A: 20, Type B: 15), significant differences were observed in operation time (69.2 vs. 91.5 vs. 114.3 min, p < 0.001), fracture healing time (9.1 vs. 10.4 vs. 12.0 weeks, p < 0.001), Constant-Murley scores (83.2 vs. 74.8 vs. 61.5, p < 0.001), and complication rates (13.6% vs. 30.0% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001). Closed reduction success rates were 90.9%, 58.3%, and 20.0% for Types T, A, and B, respectively.
conclusionsThe STAB classification system demonstrates more reliability and reproducibility, compared to both Neer and AO classifications. By distinguishing fracture-dislocation patterns based on head-stem continuity, the STAB system provides valuable prognostic information and may help optimize individualized treatment strategies for Neer type VI proximal humerus fracture-dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.