SynthesisBMC public health2026
Attitudes and misconceptions surrounding epilepsy and first aid of seizures in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMisconceptions and knowledge gaps regarding epilepsy in the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) Arabic-speaking countries are common and may endanger people with epilepsy (PWE). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify public knowledge, misconceptions, and attitudes and synthesize pooled evidence to guide public health and educational interventions.
methodsThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis of misconceptions and attitudes within Arabic-speaking countries regarding epilepsy. A comprehensive literature search of the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they were cross-sectional studies assessing epilepsy awareness and/or attitudes and conducted in Arabic-speaking countries. The Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool were used for quality assessment. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I² statistic. Results were reported as pooled proportions with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses assessed how individual studies affected the pooled results. The analysis was performed by Open Meta Analyst.
resultsAs of January 2024, 75 of 5,646 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria with a total sample size of 61,681. The pooled prevalence of good knowledge and positive attitude were 47.2% and 50.5%, respectively. The most common myth about seizure first aid was that placing objects in the mouth will decrease tongue biting with a pooled prevalence of 38.6%. Beliefs attributing the disorder to spirit possession and the evil eye had a pooled prevalence of 14.1% and 17.3%, respectively. Approximately 45% and 62% of participants were uncomfortable with their children playing with or marrying PWE. Contagion beliefs were common in the Levant (29.6%), while spirit possession was prevalent in North Africa (22.1%). Schoolteachers in the EMR had the lowest knowledge (42.2%) and least positive attitudes (33.9%). Pooled knowledge level showed minimal improvement over the past decade.
conclusionThere are still a lot of misunderstandings about epilepsy in the EMR, and these may vary depending on the demographic, study area, or historical period. Additionally, stigma around epilepsy remains a significant issue, highlighting the critical need for targeted awareness programs and legislative measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.