ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Caring for the frail: a qualitative study in an orthopaedic setting.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of frail individuals is increasing, and the proportion of frail patients in hospital settings is high. Assessing patient frailty as a part of hospital care can guide clinicians in determining which interventions are needed and what to prioritise. Orthopaedic in-patients often experience both pain and mobility limitations, which, in combination with frailty, make these patients particularly vulnerable. There is limited knowledge regarding how staff working in orthopaedic acute care units understand frailty and how they adjust their clinical practices in response. The aim is to understand how healthcare professionals in an orthopaedic acute care unit perceive frailty and possibly adapt their clinical practices in response to it.
methodsThe study adopted a qualitative design and included 16 healthcare professionals from two hospitals. Semi-structured individual face-to-face interviews were conducted, digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subsequently analysed using thematic analysis with an inductive approach.
resultsTwo themes were developed during the analysis mirroring the healthcare professionals’ perceptions. The first is “Considering an individual frail” supported by the subthemes ”Describing frailty in different ways”, “Recognising vulnerability”, “Identifying the need for support”, and “Acknowledging frailty in different contexts”. The second is “Caring for the frail”, supported by the subthemes “Understanding the concept of frailty”, “Assessing frailty”, “Taking frailty into account”, “Being one step ahead”, and “Having resource awareness”.
conclusionsThis study revealed that healthcare professionals perceive frailty as a broad and multidimensional concept that requires clearer specification to guide appropriate interventions. Participants emphasised that care is shaped primarily by individual needs rather than by frailty assessment, reflecting a person-centred approach. They also expressed a strong sense of responsibility toward frail patients and viewed hospital admission as an opportunity to identify and address unmet needs at home. While tools such as the Clinical Frailty Scale were viewed as limited in terms of capturing the full complexity of frailty, they were described as helpful for drawing attention to frailty and prompting deeper reflection. TRAIL REGISTRATION: https://researchweb.org/is/fourol/project/281574 Reg. no 28 15 74.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.