Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992134›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Integrating clinical, laboratory and quantitative CT features for predicting split renal function in urinary tract obstruction.

Ying Ma, Jie Zhan, Jiajun Feng, Wanli Zhang, Fangrong Liang, Honggang Xu, Yixiu Hao, Long Qu, Wenjuan He, Shengsheng Lai and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ying Ma *Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Jie Zhan *Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Jiajun FengDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Wanli ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Fangrong LiangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Honggang XuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Yixiu HaoDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Long QuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Wenjuan HeDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China.
Shengsheng LaiSchool of Medical Equipment, Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510520, China. laiss@gdyzy.edu.cn.
Ruimeng YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China. eyruimengyang@scut.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-9429

Funding

2025 Research Project of Guangdong Health Information Network Association No. MS-202509-0047Medical Science and Technology Research Project of Guangdong Province No. A2024637National Natural Science Foundation of China 62262029National Natural Science Foundation of China 82371908Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2024A1515012177Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20242BAB25546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary tract obstruction (UTO) can lead to progressive renal impairment, making accurate evaluation of split renal function (SRF) essential for clinical decision-making. Although radionuclide renal dynamic scintigraphy remains the gold standard for SRF assessment, its clinical application is constrained by procedural complexity, limited availability, and sensitivity to anatomical variations. Thus, there is a clinical need for simpler, reliable, and noninvasive alternative approaches. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for SRF grading by integrating clinical variables, laboratory parameters, and quantitative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) features in patients with UTO.

methodsA retrospective cohort of 78 patients with UTO (150 kidneys) was analyzed. Based on split renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determined using the Gates method, kidneys were categorized into normal, mild-to-moderate impairment, and severe impairment groups. Clinical variables, laboratory parameters, and quantitative CECT features were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors and construct SRF grading models. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsIn Task 1 (normal vs. abnormal) and Task 2 (normal vs. mild-to-moderate), age was the key univariate predictor, while hemoglobin (Hb) and renal cortical thickness (Rc) were identified as independent predictors in the laboratory-based and CECT-based multivariate models, respectively. For Task 1, the Combined model [Clinical predictor (Age) + Laboratory model (Hb-based) + CECT model (Rc-based)] achieved the highest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.890); for Task 2, the optimal model was [Clinical predictor (Age) + CECT model (Rc-based)] (AUC = 0.810). For Task 3 (mild-to-moderate vs. severe), Hb was the strongest univariate predictor, and Rc was the sole independent predictor in the CECT-based multivariate model. The highest diagnostic accuracy for Task 3 was achieved by the combined Laboratory predictor (Hb) + CECT model (Rc-based), with an AUC of 0.970.

conclusionThe CECT model (Rc-based) serves as a crucial imaging biomarker for evaluating SRF impairment in patients with UTO. Task-specific models combining the CECT model (Rc-based) with a clinical predictor (Age) and laboratory information—either as a univariable predictor (Hb) or as a multivariable laboratory model (Hb-based)—showed superior predictive performance. This integrated, noninvasive strategy may serve as a useful adjunct to radionuclide imaging for individualized SRF assessment, pending prospective validation.

Indexed as

KidneyTomography, X-Ray ComputedUreteral ObstructionAgedContrast MediaFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveContrast MediaContrast-enhanced computed tomographyRenal cortical thicknessSplit renal functionUrinary tract obstruction

Identifiers

PMID41992134
PMCPMC13202847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.