ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Mapping mood-improving behaviors in nursing homes: development and evaluation of the Actions to Improve Mood inventories.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring implicit associations with behaviours to improve resident mood: development of implicit association tasks for nursing home care providers.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNursing home residents and professional caregivers may engage in behaviors that, although not considered formal treatments for depression, can improve residents’ mood. To support future studies aiming to explore ways to complement formal depression care in nursing homes, reliable and valid instruments for measuring these informal mood-improving behaviors are needed.
methodsThis project developed and evaluated inventories to measure mood-improving behaviors in Dutch and Belgian nursing homes. Study 1 followed an iterative mixed-methods approach to develop two inventories: the Actions to Improve Mood by Residents (AIM-R) and the Actions to Improve Mood by Caregivers (AIM-C), and to assess their content validity (N = 31 residents; N = 35 caregivers, respectively). Study 2 evaluated test-retest agreement (N = 206; N = 125) and inter-rater agreement (AIM-C: N = 81) using a test-retest design. Study 3 explored the inventories’ practical application through semi-structured interviews (N = 12; N = 6). Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, content validity indices, and Gwet’s AC2 agreement coefficients.
resultsBoth inventories demonstrated acceptable content validity, with moderate to very good test-retest agreement. Inter-rater agreement for most AIM-C items was classified as “fair,” and appeared lower when caregivers completed the inventories for residents with moderate to severe cognitive decline compared to residents with no to mild cognitive decline. Thematic analysis suggested that using the inventories increased awareness of mood-improving behaviors and contributed to better knowledge about residents. Challenges regarding usability and interpretability were identified, along with suggestions for refinement.
conclusionsThe inventories appear to adequately capture mood-improving behaviors and show consistency over time. Nevertheless, their usability and interpretability could benefit from further refinement. Pending additional research, these inventories hold promise for assessing mood-improving behaviors in nursing homes, aiding future efforts to explore new ways to enhance depression care alongside traditional treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.