Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992119›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Evaluation of measles outbreak response in Geze Gofa district, South Ethiopia region, using the 7-1-7 timeliness metrics.

Lensa Fekadu, Abduilahafiz Hassen, Habtamu Yimer, Donatus Nbonibe Abaane, Tinsae Eshetu, Jafer Kezali, Assefa Tola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lensa FekaduEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. lensafekadubenti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2758-5183
Abduilahafiz HassenResolve To Save Lives, Ethiopia Office, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Habtamu YimerMinistry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Donatus Nbonibe AbaaneAfrica Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tinsae EshetuEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jafer KezaliEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Assefa TolaSchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasles remains a highly contagious, vaccine-preventable disease with significant morbidity, particularly among under-immunized populations. Despite routine immunization and Supplementary Immunization Activities (SIAs), Ethiopia continues to experience recurrent outbreaks. The 7-1-7 framework provides benchmarks for timely outbreak detection, notification, and early response actions. This study aimed to describe measles outbreak epidemiology and evaluate response timeliness using 7-1-7 framework in Geze Gofa District of Southern Ethiopia.

methodsA mixed-methods field investigation was conducted from January to February 2025. Data were collected through active case finding, health facility record reviews, interviews with healthcare workers and caregivers, and observation of vaccination documentation. The 7–1–7 framework was applied to assess the timeliness of detection, notification, and response. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze case demographics and response timelines, while thematic analysis was employed to identify bottlenecks and enablers.

resultsA total of 39 measles cases were identified, predominantly children aged 1–14 years (82.1%). Overall district attack rate was 0.37 per 1000 population [95% CI: 0.27–0.51], highest among children 0–4 years (1.11 per 1000 population [95% CI: 0.65–1.78]. The outbreak was notified within 1 day, meeting the 7–1–7 benchmarks. However, detection took place 11 days after the first case emergence and response activities were initiated in full at 11 days, both of which exceeded the target of 7 days. The delay in detection was mainly due to the absence of active surveillance in the community, and the response was further delayed by the need for laboratory confirmation, which took 10 days. Additional challenges included rugged terrain, limited vaccine supply, and insufficiently trained personnel. Despite these barriers, early notification were facilitated by trained health workers at outpatient service department and effective mobile communication systems. Notably, 13% of cases were unvaccinated, and an additional 12.8% had unknown vaccination status, despite reported MCV1 and MCV2 coverage rates of 96% and 94%, respectively in Geze Gofa District.

conclusionThe Geze Gofa measles outbreak response demonstrated strengths in notification but was hindered by delayed detection and response initiation due to systemic and logistical constraints. To enhance outbreak preparedness and align with the 7–1–7 framework, active surveillance should be strengthened, and national protocols should be revised to allow provisional vaccination based on clinical and epidemiological evidence. Decentralizing laboratory services and strengthening vaccine logistics are also critical to improving response timeliness and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksMeaslesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfantMaleMeasles VaccineTime FactorsUnvaccinated PersonsVaccinationMeasles Vaccine7–1–7 frameworkEthiopiaMeaslesOutbreak responsePublic health surveillanceTimelinessVaccine coverage

Identifiers

PMID41992119
PMCPMC13224625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.