Trial reportBMC geriatrics2026
Frame fit: safety, acceptability and effectiveness of a community-based fall prevention exercise intervention for walking frame users, a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWalking frame users are at increased risk of falls due to gait and balance impairments and restrictions caused by the frame itself. While exercise is an effective fall prevention intervention in the general population, there are no programmes specific to walking frame users. Adaptations may be required for walking frame users to achieve an appropriate intensity and dose of fall prevention exercise without increasing the propensity to fall while exercising. The Frame Fit intervention is a home exercise programme adapted for the needs of frame users. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, acceptability and effectiveness of the Frame Fit intervention.
methodsCommunity dwelling older people (aged ≥ 65) who use a walking frame were recruited to the randomised controlled trial and allocated to the 6-month Frame Fit intervention, a programme of home exercises prescribed and progressed by a physiotherapist, or to usual care. Falls (primary outcome) were recorded using diaries for 12 months from randomisation. Physical performance (grip strength, balance, gait speed and sit-to-stand), timed up and go, physical activity, fear of falling and health-related quality of life was measured at baseline and after six months. Secondary healthcare use and mortality was collected from electronic records for 12 months from randomisation.
resultsOf 117 participants randomised, (59 to intervention, 58 to usual care), 86 were followed up at six months and 83 provided 12 month falls data. There were two intervention-related adverse events. There were more falls reported by the intervention group than control group at six months (adj, IRR: 2.10, 95%CI 1.06–3.98) but no difference in falls at 12 months (adj.IRR:1.76, 95%CI 0.93–3.33). Adherence was satisfactory but there was low uptake to the trial. There were no differences found in the secondary outcome measures.
conclusionsFrame Fit intervention offered a satisfactory safety profile, was acceptable to those who participated and feasible. Due to low recruitment rates, the study was underpowered to detect a difference in falls or other outcomes. Further research is needed to optimally tailor fall prevention interventions to walking frame users.
trial registrationThe protocol was prospectively registered as a clinical trial with the ISRCTN (clinical trial number: 57645734) on 11/09/2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.