ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
Lessons learned from applying eDNA surveying to diadromous fish detection across the Northeast Atlantic region.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regular monitoring of diadromous fishes is critical to inform their management and conservation. Yet, the in situ data collection for these species is challenging due to their complex life cycle and low abundance. Focusing on the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus, Petromyzontidae) and the European shads (allis shad Alosa alosa and twaite shad Alosa fallax, Clupeidae), emblematic diadromous fishes in the Northeast Atlantic region, this study leverages the use of aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) samples to monitor their distribution range. For that aim, we developed quantitative PCR (qPCR) and digital PCR (dPCR) assays and applied them to detect sea lamprey and European shad DNA in a network of 44 river basins across Spain, France, Ireland and the UK. We found that qPCR efficiently detected presence/absence of European shads, whereas the higher sensitivity of dPCR was essential for detecting sea lamprey, which is likely to occur at lower abundance. Moreover, sea lamprey showed significantly lower eDNA copies per litre of water compared to European shads, probably due to their larvae spending several years burrowed within soft sediments, reducing eDNA shedding into the water column. The integration of previously recorded data as reference datasets with this wide-ranging snapshot study enhances our understanding of the distribution of sea lamprey and European shads in Northeast Atlantic rivers. Importantly, the lessons learned within this international collaboration are critical towards achieving a prevailing framework for conservation of migratory fishes, highlighting the need of well-designed sampling strategies coupled with species-specific assays applied to eDNA samples to boost long-term monitoring efforts of diadromous species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.