ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2026
Transcriptomic Profiling of Canine Mammary Tumours Reveals Significant Heterogeneity Between and Within Histological Classes.
Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic and microRNA Profiling Suggest a Candidate RIPPLY1-cfa-miR-187 Relationship in Canine Mammary Gland Tumours From Dogs With Confirmed Metastasis.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Profiling of Canine Mammary Tumours Reveals Significant Heterogeneity Between and Within Histological Classes.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of 128 canine mammary tumours (CMTs), aiming to characterize their molecular landscape. Differential gene expression analysis (DGE), gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and clustering based on the human PAM50 gene panel were applied to explore molecular differences between the different histological categories. The analysis revealed transcriptomic differences between benign and malignant tumours as well as between tumours with high and low mitotic count. Malignant tumours were significantly enriched for gene sets associated with cell cycle regulation, proliferation, inflammatory response, signalling pathways and metabolic processes. Of the malignant tumours, purely epithelial tumours were enriched in gene sets related to proliferation, signalling and metabolic processes when compared to mixed tumours harbouring myoepithelial or mesenchymal components. To assess the relevance of human classification systems, CMTs were clustered on the PAM50 genes. The analysis revealed two clusters resembling human basal-like and luminal A subtypes, while the remaining tumours did not display expression patterns similar to human breast cancer subtypes. This suggests that there are limitations to applying the human molecular classification systems to canine tumours without adaptation. Additionally, CMTs displayed intragroup heterogeneity, where not all tumours within a histopathological category clustered together, indicating that the molecular aspect of CMTs is not necessarily reflected in the pathology. Together, this study highlights the need to develop canine-specific molecular markers based on gene expression, which could enable diagnosis prior to surgical removal of tumours, and ultimately improve treatment strategies and outcomes for dogs with mammary tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.