ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Visual Behavior in Inline Speed Skating: An Eye-Tracking Evaluation for Performance Analysis.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzed oculomotor behavior (fixations and saccades) in 19 competitive inline speed skaters (5 males, 14 females; aged 10-26 years) from the Aragonese Skating Federation (Spain), comparing high-performance (N1) and intermediate (N2) groups. Participants completed optometric assessments and eye-tracking during 200 m time trials on a banked oval track using a Pupil Labs Neon device, with recordings taken before (PRE) and after (POST) intensive training. Results showed visual behavior remained stable overall, but curved segments (C1, C2) required significantly more fixations and saccades than straights. Skaters consistently focused on the inner track line during curves, suggesting an optimized visual strategy. High-performance skaters (N1) demonstrated greater efficiency with fewer fixations and saccades in key segments. After training, N1 skaters showed increased fixations in C1 (p = 0.012) but reduced saccadic velocity (SS: PRE 8.00 deg/s vs. POST 6.82 deg/s; p = 0.030) and length (S1: PRE 3077.41 mm vs. POST 2564.71 mm; p = 0.035) on straights, consistent with fatigue. N1 exhibited different patterns of ocular abilities versus N2 pre- and port-training. Strong binocular coordination was observed (right-left eye correlations ≥ 0.85; p < 0.001). Conclusions indicate that experience enhances visual efficiency, with elite skaters showing more focused gaze patterns. Training-induced fatigue may primarily affect straight segments, reducing saccade speed and length. The finish line served as a consistent visual reference point. These findings highlight the importance of sport-specific visual training and fatigue management in inline speed skating. Future research should address study limitations including small sample size and gender imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.