Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992059›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

Hepatic metastasis surveillance in uveal melanoma: a retrospective cohort study from a UK tertiary centre (2006-2022).

Benjamin Rea, Mahan Salehi, Ahmed Maiter, Lorraine Ochieng, Sarah Lanham, Joe Kang, Sharabh Sinha, Jenna Hawthorn, Amarit Gill, Christopher Johns and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Benjamin Rea *Department of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK. Benjamin.Rea@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-0359
Mahan Salehi *Department of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Ahmed MaiterDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Lorraine OchiengDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sarah LanhamDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Joe KangDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sharabh SinhaDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Jenna HawthornDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Amarit GillDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Christopher JohnsDepartment of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Michael J CampbellSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Umiya HarleyDepartment of Ocular Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Hibba QuhillDepartment of Ocular Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-3168
Sachin SalviDepartment of Ocular Oncology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-4987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver surveillance imaging is essential for detecting early asymptomatic metastases in uveal melanoma, which predominantly involves the liver. Early detection may improve treatment opportunities, but variability in imaging protocols and a lack of consensus on surveillance duration present challenges. This study aimed to evaluate our systemic surveillance protocol, optimise pathways, and assess risk factors for metastasis.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma between 2006 and 2021 who underwent hepatic imaging surveillance at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Demographics, tumour characteristics, treatments, disease status, and survival outcomes were collected.

resultsAmong 1086 patients (45% female, 79% White; median age 68 years), 315 (29%) developed metastases, with 293 (93%) detected within five years of ocular treatment. The number needed to scan (NNS) increased substantially after five years, indicating reduced detection efficiency. Higher T stage and ciliary body involvement were significantly associated with increased metastatic risk (P < 0.01).

conclusionsMost metastases from uveal melanoma occur within five years of treatment. Personalised, risk-based surveillance strategies considering tumour stage and location may improve efficiency and optimise healthcare resource use.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsMelanomaUveal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTertiary Care CentersUnited KingdomUveal Melanoma

Identifiers

PMID41992059
PMCPMC13270131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.