Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41992053›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Challenging the mechanism for the implicit association test.

Kyle J LaFollette, Doroteja Rubez, Heath A Demaree, Amit Goldenberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle J LaFolletteBooth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. kyle.lafollette@chicagobooth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-7387
Doroteja RubezDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Heath A DemareeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-8882
Amit GoldenbergHarvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implicit biases are stereotypes and attitudes that influence decisions and actions, contributing to discrimination and societal inequities. The implicit association test is the most widely used tool for measuring implicit bias, assessing response time in sorting stimuli into labelled categories. Most interpretations assume that implicit association test performance (D-scores) reflects conflicting associative memories or decision ease. We challenged this assumption by decomposing D-scores into additional cognitive processes that may influence results, particularly response caution-the tendency to trade speed for accuracy. Using racing diffusion models across 39 topics (N = 115,601), we found that response caution explained significantly more variance in D-scores beyond decision ease. Response caution also best predicted explicitly reported biases. These findings challenge the traditional interpretation of D-scores as primarily reflecting associative memory activation and highlight the need to consider multiple cognitive processes when assessing implicit biases.

Indexed as

AssociationBias, ImplicitDecision MakingHumansMemoryReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID41992053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.