ArticleScientific reports2026
Variability in self-reported depression symptomology and associated behavioral markers in digital phenotyping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital phenotyping with large language models to detect depressive state changes in patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital phenotyping studies using smartphone-sensed data have identified several behavioral markers associated with depression. However, the generalizability of these markers is constrained by multiple factors, including variability in depressive symptoms and associated behaviors, both between and within individuals over time. This study explores variability in depression symptoms and associated behaviors using smartphone-sensed data collected from participants diagnosed with depression. It examines behavioral features derived from smartphone sensing as potential markers of depression. We analyzed smartphone-sensed behavioral data from 62 patients with major depressive episodes across three subgroups: major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 41), borderline personality disorder (BPD, n = 12), and bipolar disorder (BD, n = 9). Depression symptoms were assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Symptoms differed between subgroups and across severity levels. Association analysis suggested variability in correlations between depression severity and behavioral features, both between participants and over time. Multilevel modeling identified two demographic predictors, employment status (β = − 4.79, 95% CI [− 7.65, − 1.80], p = 0.004) and age (β = − 0.12, 95% CI [− 0.25, 0.00], p = 0.050), along with one behavioral predictor, lower nighttime movement (β = − 0.79, 95% CI [− 1.29, − 0.29], p = 0.024), that were associated with depression severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.