ArticleScientific reports2026
Temporal trends in cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevalence in the United States: assessing compression versus expansion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent trends from Western countries indicate a stagnation of life expectancy gains, raising questions about the mechanisms that sustain healthy aging and morbidity compression. In this study, we focus on trends in cardiovascular diseases and diabetes and their determinants in the United States, as relevant contributors to potential morbidity compression and, consequently, to increases in healthy life expectancy. Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 1990 to 2023, we apply a pseudo-panel approach to analyze morbidity patterns across birth cohorts in the United States. The models account for covariates such as BMI, smoking, ethnicity, gender, income, and education, including relevant nonlinearities and interactions to capture heterogeneity in disease risk. Findings show that, at comparable ages, more recent cohorts exhibit higher disease risk, for diabetes, a pattern that is not consistent with morbidity compression. These results are largely explained by the growing presence of behavioral and socioeconomic risk factors, such as overweight and low income, which disproportionately affect younger cohorts. Our study contributes to the growing literature documenting worsening population health trajectories in countries with advanced medical systems and highlights the need for public health strategies that address both behavioral and structural determinants to promote healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.