ArticleScientific reports2026
Cross-attention-based hybrid feature fusion network for state-of-health estimation of lithium-ion batteries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating the state of health (SOH) of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is crucial in a battery management system. To improve the accuracy of SOH estimation, a new method that combines a Gramian angle field (GAF) and multi–model fusion is proposed. First, the GAF is used to encode incremental capacity data into an image, making small differences easier to identify. Second, a Gramian angle field–convolutional neural network–long short-term memory model with a bi-directional cross-attention–based fusion network (GAF-CNN-Fusion-LSTM) is proposed to solve the problem of original feature loss, that is, the partial loss of original temporal feature information during the image conversion process. By introducing a bi-directional cross-attention mechanism, the model enables deep interaction and effective fusion between image and time-series features, thereby improving the accuracy and robustness of SOH estimation. Finally, the proposed method was validated using the NASA and Oxford datasets. On the NASA dataset, the proposed model achieved an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0033, which was 73.4%, 47.6%, 57.1%, and 44.1% lower than those of the CNN-LSTM model, GAF-CNN-LSTM model, direct-concatenation model, and uni-directional attention model from the image branch to the time-series branch, respectively. On the Oxford dataset, the average RMSE was 0.0021. These results demonstrate that the GAF-CNN-Fusion-LSTM model has higher accuracy and stronger robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.