ArticleScientific reports2026
Linking satellite-derived vegetation health parameters to arborist ground observations in urban environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trees in cities play a crucial role in regulating the urban environment and promoting citizens’ health and well-being. However, trees are under constant stress, causing reduction of provided ecosystem services, faster decline, and a need for intensive maintenance. Here, we test parameters derived from Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) that enables effective health and vitality assessment through satellite observation in two pilot cities (Lisbon and Copenhagen), and link them to arboricultural terms using data from ground surveys. Results show differences in the interpretation of EVI in contrasting environments. In Copenhagen, trees respond to stress through changes in chlorophyll content expressed by EVI, whereas in Lisbon, EVI primarily reflects variations in vitality. The newly introduced composite stress index shows strong agreement with arborist observations. These results highlight the EVI as a promising and cost-effective tool for assessing the health status of urban greenery, reducing the need for frequent and expensive ground observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.