ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2026
Delineation of the heterogeneity underlying genomic instability in hereditary breast cancers reveals four disease subtypes.
Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancers (hBCs) exhibit genomic heterogeneity, but their underlying genomic instability and clinical implications remain unclear. We conducted whole-genome sequencing on 129 BRCA1/2-negative hBCs, with subsets analyzed by methylome and transcriptome sequencing, and integrated COSMIC mutational, copy number (CN), and structural variation signatures. We identified four subtypes: homologous recombination-deficient (HRD), mutation-dominant (MUT), CN-dominant, and genome stable. HRD tumors exhibited genomic instability, including promoter hypermethylation and loss of heterozygosity at BRCA1/2. Some HRD-low hBC genomes showed elevated mutations and CN changes, indicating HRD-independent mechanisms. MUT tumors showed high tumor mutation burdens with APOBEC-associated kataegis and cytolytic/immune-activation programs with M1 macrophage including upregulation of GZMA, GZMB, and large-scale transition. CN tumors were enriched for small-scale loss of heterozygosity maintaining euploidy with recurrent focal losses implicating classic tumor suppressors. Transcriptomics indicated immune and stromal infiltration in MUT and CN subtypes, respectively, suggesting subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. Functional analysis in cell lines suggests poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy sensitivity in HRD and CN tumors, whereas immune features in MUT tumors support vulnerability to immunotherapy. These findings suggest that distinct hBC subtypes delineated by genomic instability can advance insights into molecular heterogeneity beyond expression-based classifications and support an integrative genomic instability index (HRD score, ploidy, size-stratified CN burden, and signature exposures) for patient stratification and personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.