ArticleScientific data2026
An EEG dataset for understanding driving expertise from naturalistic urban road experiments.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An EEG dataset for understanding driving expertise from naturalistic urban road experiments.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern autonomous driving algorithms in complex urban environments strive for safety, comfort, and intelligence, qualities exemplified by expert drivers. This paper presents a comprehensive EEG dataset comparing 10 expert and 10 novice drivers in 13 naturalistic urban driving conditions on a fixed 5.7-kilometer route in in a city. Our multi-modal dataset synchronizes brain activity with vehicle CAN bus data, traffic participant information, and psychophysiological measures (Electrodermal Activity and Heart Rate) from drivers. Uniquely, we also collected physiological and subjective feedback from two passengers per trip to validate driving performance quality. All participants (drivers and passengers) completed a series of standardized subjective questionnaires at pre- and post-experiment. Finally, they participated in post-drive semi-structured interviews exploring driver decision-making processes and passenger experience. This novel dataset enables researchers to decode the neural signatures underlying driving expertise, providing valuable insights for developing more human-like, intelligent autonomous driving algorithms that can better navigate the complexities of urban traffic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.