Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991936›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026

AI-enhanced approaches for personalized cardiac treatment: insights from ECG data.

Vibha Tiwari, Rohit Gupta, Akshada Telang, Akshra Tiwari, Rebakah Geddam, Muhammad Awais, Muhammad Ahmed Khan, Hemant Ghayvat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vibha TiwariCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Madhav Institute of Technology and Science (Deemed University), Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rohit GuptaCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Madhav Institute of Technology and Science (Deemed University), Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Akshada TelangCentre for Artificial Intelligence, Madhav Institute of Technology and Science (Deemed University), Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Akshra TiwariSchool of Sciences, Christ University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rebakah GeddamDepartment of Computer Science and Media Technology, Faculty of Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Muhammad AwaisDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Muhammad Ahmed KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Hemant GhayvatDepartment of Computer Science and Media Technology, Faculty of Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden. hemant.ghayvat@lnu.se.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of drug-induced alterations in the electrocardiogram (ECG) is essential in measuring cardiac safety, but manual analysis is not always accurate enough to identify subtle but important effects. This paper examines how machine learning (ML) models can be used to categorize various pharmacological treatments according to their distinct ECG patterns to establish a platform of individualized therapeutic evaluation. Using the public ECG Effects of Dofetilide, Moxifloxacin, Dofetilide+Mexiletine, Dofetilide+Lidocaine and Moxifloxacin+Diltiazem (ECGDMMLD) database, key electrophysiological features were extracted-including heart rate variability (HRV) and standard cardiac intervals (RR, PR, QT, QRS) to train and compare three different classifiers: XGBoost, Random Forest, and a Support Vector Machine (SVM). The analysis showed that tree-based ensemble techniques were very useful in this task. The XGBoost model had a better classification accuracy of 98.1%, which was closely followed by the random forest at 97.3%. Conversely, the SVM had much lower accuracy, implying that it was not as well adapted to the complexity of the high-dimensional ECG data. These results establish that ML models, particularly XGBoost, can accurately decode complex drug-induced cardiac signatures from ECG data. This work is a powerful demonstration of the proof-of-concept of automated and data-driven analytics integration into clinical processes to enhance drug safety and promote personalized medicine.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyPrecision MedicineArtificial IntelligenceBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHeart RateHumansMachine LearningRandom ForestSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41991936
PMCPMC13198540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.