ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
A scoping review on information and support needs regarding cancer and work: part II-needs of employers and professionals in supporting cancer survivors.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEmployers and professionals can support cancer survivors during sick leave and return to work (RTW). However, they often face challenges in providing RTW support and existing interventions targeted at them are scarce and show limited effectiveness. This study aims to examine information and support needs of employers and professionals regarding sick leave and RTW of cancer survivors.
methodsFor this scoping review, studies published between 2014 and 2024 were systematically searched across five databases. Included studies had to (1) involve employers (direct supervisors or HR managers) or professionals (healthcare and occupational health professionals); (2) use a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study design; and (3) report at least one information or support need in the results. Identified needs were qualitatively synthesized using the Arena in work disability prevention model.
resultsForty studies from 15 countries identified a diversity of needs across the personal, healthcare, workplace, and legislative systems. Employers and professionals need information and support on late effects of cancer and its treatment, providing RTW support, legislation, and multidisciplinary collaboration. Additionally, employers need information on communication, while professionals need support in assessing cancer survivors' work capacity and functional abilities.
conclusionsDiverse information and support needs were identified. Some needs were universal, while others were context-dependent, as they depended on country-specific legislation. Multidisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders is essential, and contextual factors should be integrated into future interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Addressing employers' and professionals' needs enables more comprehensive and personalized support for cancer survivors and strengthens RTW support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41991898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.