ArticleDiscover mental health2026
Mental health clinicians' perceptions and perceived challenges about recommending mental health apps to patients in Ethiopia.
Article in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMobile health apps are becoming increasingly popular and are viewed as supplementary aids that simplify healthcare tasks, facilitate patient follow-up, monitor patient symptoms, and support self-care. Their utility may be essential in low-resource countries including Ethiopia. However, their accessibility, availability, trustworthiness, and credibility were identified as the main perceived challenges when recommending the app to patients.
objectiveTo explore mental healthcare professionals’ perceptions and perceived challenges about mental health apps for patients with depression and anxiety.
methodsTwo focus group discussions were conducted with mental healthcare professionals (n = 14) from February 10–20, 2024, at Amanuel Mental Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia. The collected audio-recorded data were transcribed into text, coded, and then exported to NVivo version 14 for analysis.
resultsA total of 14 multi-disciplinary mental health professionals participated in focus group discussions. The first focus group consisted of 8 study participants, and the second focus group comprised 6 participants. Most of the interviewed health professionals (12) were male. Four main themes were identified: (1) perceived benefit (improvement of patients’ well-being and mental health accessibility), (2) perceived alleviation of healthcare work burden, (3) perceived challenges (usability, accessibility, trustworthiness, credibility and effectiveness), and (4) suggested app features (psychoeducational, self-assessment and self-monitoring, self-care, multimedia and reminders).
conclusionThe involvement of mental health professionals is vital for the successful development of mobile mental health apps. App features such as psychoeducational, self-assessment, self-monitoring, self-care, multimedia, and reminders received positive feedback from healthcare professionals. However, participants expressed and perceived challenges about the app’s accessibility, availability, effectiveness, trustworthiness, and credibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.