Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991782›Full record

Trial reportThe patient2026

Experiences of Migraine and Erenumab Treatment in Japan: Qualitative Interviews with Clinical Trial Participants.

Carla Dias-Barbosa, Hisaka Igarashi, Ashley Duenas, Asha Hareendran, Shigekazu Kitamura, Shigeya Tanaka, Naoko Sanno, Hikaru Doi, Tsutomu Nagamitsu, Yoshihisa Tatsuoka and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in The patient, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03812224 (A Phase 3 Japanese Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03812224 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Japanese Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Migraine Prevention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2019 to 2020Enrolled261ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carla Dias-BarbosaPPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, London, UK. carla.dias-barbosa@evidera.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-8825
Hisaka IgarashiFujitsu Clinic, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ashley DuenasPPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, London, UK.
Asha HareendranPPD Evidera Patient-Centered Research, Thermo Fisher Scientific, London, UK.
Shigekazu KitamuraKonan Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Shigeya TanakaTanaka Neurosurgical Clinic, Kagoshima, Japan.
Naoko SannoShinagawa Strings Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Hikaru DoiDoi Clinic Internal Medicine/Neurology, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tsutomu NagamitsuNagamitsu Clinic, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Yoshihisa TatsuokaTatsuoka Neurology Clinic, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuhiko MatsumoriSendai Headache and Neurology Clinic, Miyagi, Japan.
Miki HasebeAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Takao TakeshimaTominaga Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Japan, migraine is estimated to affect 6-8.6% of the population, and the burden of migraine and barriers to migraine care are substantial. Although new preventive treatments are available for migraine, there is limited qualitative information about the lived experience of adults with migraine in Japan and how these treatments improve their day-to-day lives.

methodsParticipants in a qualitative interview study embedded in a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT03812224) were invited to take part in a telephone interview after completing 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with once-monthly erenumab 70 mg and a subsequent 28-week open-label treatment period. Interviews were conducted by Japanese interviewers using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.

resultsForty-one participants were interviewed between May and September 2020. The mean age of participants was 43.8 years; 82.9% were female, 51.2% had episodic migraine, and 48.8% had chronic migraine. Prior to trial participation, patients identified pain, nausea, and profound tiredness-often expressed as a "lack of energy" or feeling "exhausted" or "drained"-as the most bothersome symptoms. Patients also emphasized difficulties concentrating, interference with school, work, and household responsibilities, and emotional strain as the most bothersome impacts of living with migraine. At the end of the trial, patients reported important improvements in their migraine experience-such as reductions in migraine frequency, severity, and duration-which translated into tangible benefits in daily life. Overall, satisfaction with erenumab was high (mean score 6.8 on a 0-10 scale) and was mainly driven by the reduced frequency and duration of migraine.

conclusionResults from this qualitative study confirm that migraine significantly impacts the quality of life of adults in Japan. This study provides valuable insights into patients' experiences of erenumab, which reduced the frequency, severity, or duration of migraine episodes in most patients, resulting in better functioning and overall quality of life.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03812224. Registered January 23, 2019.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicJapanMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonistserenumab

Identifiers

PMID41991782
PMCPMC13506571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.