ReviewBehavior research methods2026
A primer on intensive longitudinal psychometrics.
Review in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intensive Longitudinal Data Collection Methods in Health Research: Tutorial for Selecting Measures and Designing a Sampling Protocol.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many intensive longitudinal studies are interested in topics that are not always amenable to direct physical measurement and instead are often theorized as latent constructs (e.g., affect, emotion, mood, behavior, personality). However, several recent reviews suggest that few empirical studies using scales to measure these constructs consider or report psychometrics when working with intensive longitudinal data (only 15-50%). Furthermore, a recent survey reported that many researchers working with intensive longitudinal data do not consider psychometrics because they either do not know how or are unaware that such methods exist. This is potentially problematic because it can be unclear whether momentary shifts in the variables represent true, construct-relevant changes or merely measurement error. Therefore, the goals of the current paper are to (a) provide an overview of the existing intensive longitudinal psychometric methods, (b) demonstrate how these methods can be applied, and (c) show how including psychometric methods can supplement and fortify intensive longitudinal analyses. Specifically, the paper covers four main topics: reliability, construct validation, measurement invariance, and measurement error modeling. The paper is also accompanied by a Shiny application to facilitate access and implementation of these methods. Supplemental materials provide in-depth walkthroughs of software applications in R and Mplus with annotated code for the empirical examples in the paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41991775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.