ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Is four the same as 4? Exploring whether stimulus repetitions or identity repetitions drive voluntary task choice.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Though the voluntary task-switching paradigm asks participants to select their task and whether to switch on each trial internally, external bottom-up information from the stimulus affects task choice, such that participants were more likely to switch tasks on stimulus switches than stimulus repetitions (e.g., Mayr & Bell, Psychological Science, 17(9), 774-780, 2006). In previous research, both the perceptual elements and the identity of the stimulus changed on a stimulus switch, producing ambiguity with regard to which of the two changes drove the effect. By intermixing two stimulus types (words and Arabic numerals in Experiment 1; words and dot arrays in Experiment 2), we aimed to disentangle whether stimulus or identity repetitions drive stimulus-based switching. We produced lists with equal numbers of full stimulus repetitions (4 → 4), full stimulus switches (4 → one), and trials where the identity repeated but the stimulus changed (identity repetitions; 4 → four). We replicated the previous finding that participants were more likely to repeat the previous task on a full stimulus repetition than they were with a full stimulus switch. However, identity repetitions were not statistically different from full stimulus switches. These findings indicate that bottom-up perceptual information, rather than stimulus identity, may be what drives stimulus-based switching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41991762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.