ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
NAVA use in infants with established bronchopulmonary dysplasia, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and those on ECMO: a narrative literature review.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus conventional mechanical ventilation for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) is an innovative mode of ventilation that delivers support in synchrony with the infant's diaphragmatic electrical activity. This technology aims to improve patient-ventilator interaction, making its use in neonates with complex respiratory disease appealing. The use of NAVA in preterm infants is becoming more commonplace, but the specific role of NAVA in infants with established bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), and those requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support remain less clearly defined. Few studies have directly compared NAVA to conventional modes in those settings, but existing evidence suggests that NAVA may be feasible and beneficial, particularly by improving synchrony, reducing ventilator days, supporting post-extubation success, reducing sedation needs, and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes. We performed a narrative review of the current literature describing NAVA use in these three high-risk neonatal populations. Despite growing interest, high-quality evidence remains limited, and significant heterogeneity exists in the currently published literature. Further randomized prospective studies are needed to better define the role of NAVA in these complex patient populations and to evaluate long-term respiratory outcomes. This review aims to inform clinicians navigating the nuanced use of NAVA in advanced neonatal respiratory care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.