ArticleActa neurochirurgica2026
Morphometric assessment of the posterior cranial fossa and its contents in patients with chiari malformation type I and type 0.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response To: Chiari Malformation Type 0: Methodological Concerns Regarding the Null Structural Finding.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Chiari malformation type 0: methodological concerns regarding the null structural finding.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChiari Malformation Type I and Type 0 are congenital malformations diagnosed by MRI findings of at least 5 mm and less than 3 mm of cerebellar ectopy below the foramen magnum respectively. In this study we aimed that to comparatively analyze the morphometry of the clivus, tentorium, and posterior cranial fossa in patients with Chiari malformation Types I and 0 versus healthy subjects, and to assess the potential contribution of these measurements to diagnostic accuracy.
methodsIn this study mid-sagittal MRI scans of 326 individuals obtained between 2018-2025 and including patients with Chiari Type I malformation (n = 111), Chiari Type 0 malformation (n = 27), and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 188), were retrospectively analyzed. Multiple cranial base, posterior cranial fossa, cerebellar, and intracranial morphometric parameters and area-based ratios were measured on mid-sagittal T1-weighted images.
resultsWe observed that, compared with Chiari Type 0 patients and controls, Chiari Type I patients exhibited a significantly shorter clivus, reduced posterior cranial fossa area, and increased cerebellar area, whereas foramen magnum diameter and total brain area were comparable among groups. Ratio-based analyses demonstrated significantly higher cerebellum-to-posterior fossa and cerebellum-to-brain area ratios in Chiari Type I, indicating increased relative cerebellar occupancy despite preserved global cranial proportions.
conclusionChiari Type I malformation is characterized by specific cranial base remodeling. These morphometric alterations are absent in Chiari Type 0, which remains anatomically comparable to healthy controls. These findings suggest that CM-I is associated with distinct morphoanatomical features, whereas CM-0 does not demonstrate a consistent structural substrate and may represent a functionally defined condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.