ArticleScientific reports2026
LGGC-Net: a local-global graph and color attention-based lightweight CNN for skin cancer classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing clinically deployable AI systems for skin cancer classification remains challenging due to limited robustness, lack of interpretability and constrained computational resources in hospitals. Although many deep learning models report high accuracy, their large sizes, extensive training requirements and low generalizability hinder practical deployment. In this study, we propose LGGC-Net, a lightweight CNN that incorporates LGGC (Local, Global Graph, and Color) attention to enhance discriminative feature learning while maintaining computational efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that LGGC attention consistently improves performance across all evaluated CNN backbones. The LGGC-Net model was assessed on external image sets with diverse skin tones to ensure robustness and generalizability under domain shift conditions. Ablation studies analyzed the contribution of individual attention components and explainability was examined using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping++ (Grad-CAM++) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). With only 0.81 million parameters, LGGC-Net achieved 88.05% accuracy in 50 epochs, corresponding to 1.761 accuracy per epoch and 108.7 accuracy per million parameters in binary classification. In multiclass settings, it attained 76.1% accuracy on the unseen HAM10000 dataset, with 1.52 accuracy per epoch and 94.0 accuracy per million parameters. In both cases, the area under the curve exceeded 0.93. LGGC-Net consistently outperformed existing methods on deployment-oriented metrics, maintaining stable accuracy. These results indicate that LGGC-Net is an effective, interpretable and potentially deployment-ready solution for practical skin cancer classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.