ArticleScientific reports2026
A phantom mimicking layered biological microenvironments investigated with 7T diffusion weighted MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a physical phantom that mimics laminar biological microstructure with controlled geometric and diffusional properties. The primary goal of this study is to characterize the diffusion properties of the phantom and to assess how laminar microstructural geometry influences diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signals. The phantom consists of stacked polyethylene foils forming water layers with thicknesses ranging from ~ 1 to 16 μm. Water diffusion within these layers is free in-plane but restricted perpendicular to the boundaries. We initially modeled the perpendicular component of the signal using a Laplacian spectral approach, while the parallel component was described by standard Gaussian attenuation. Although this model captures the overall signal behavior, the measured data reveal systematic deviations attributable to local structural inhomogeneities, such as the formation of water pockets between foil layers. To account for these effects, we introduce an extension of the model that incorporates spatial variations in layer spacing. Our data, acquired on a 7 T MRI scanner, show good agreement with the extended model and suggest the presence of such water pockets. Their planar dimensions, which range from 28 to 1500 μm, depend on foil compression and scale proportionally with the thickness of the water layer. These findings show that accurate diffusion models are needed to correctly estimate the phantom's microstructure, and that the developed phantom is a useful tool for studying laminar diffusion. The remaining mismatch between the model and the data suggests that additional structural factors, not captured by the model, also influence the measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.