ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Predicting head and neck cancer response to radiotherapy using mathematical modeling of MRI-based habitats.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Twins for Targeted Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: From Molecular Stratification to Resistance-Aware Combination Strategies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting hypoxia may enable personalized radiotherapy to improve outcomes through biologically guided dose modulation. To predict hypoxia status, we integrate advanced MRI methods-oxygen-enhanced MRI (OE-MRI) for hypoxia, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for perfusion and cellularity-with a mathematical model of radiation response. Data were collected before and during radiotherapy for 20 patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. MRI data were analyzed to derive parameters describing hypoxia, perfusion, and cellularity, clustering each tumor into four habitats at each time point. The model was calibrated using n-fold cross-validation to determine optimal parameters describing response over weeks 2 and 4 of radiotherapy in primary and nodal disease. Prediction accuracy was evaluated on unseen data using Pearson (PCC) and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Predictions for perfused hypoxic primary and nodal tumors showed strong correlation (PCC ranging from 0.74 to 0.77) and agreement (CCC ranging from 0.68 to 0.70). Using MRI-based habitats, the model accurately forecasts patient-specific tumor response, potentially supporting personalized radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.