Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991576›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026

Predicting head and neck cancer response to radiotherapy using mathematical modeling of MRI-based habitats.

David A Hormuth, Michael J Dubec, Abhishek Rao, Alexandra Lozano Reyes, Kevin J Harrington, David L Buckley, James Pb O'Connor, Thomas E Yankeelov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David A HormuthOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX, USA. david.hormuth@utexas.edu.
Michael J DubecDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Abhishek RaoBiomedical Engineering, Austin, TX, USA.
Alexandra Lozano ReyesBiomedical Engineering, Austin, TX, USA.
Kevin J HarringtonDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
David L BuckleyChristie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
James Pb O'ConnorDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. james.o'connor@manchester.ac.uk.
Thomas E YankeelovOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Imaging-based tumor forecasting to predict brain tumor progression and response to therapyR01CA260003 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI QUARLES, CHRISTOPHER CHAD, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2022 to 2025
$3.2M
INTEGRATING OMICS AND QUANTITATIVE IMAGING DATA IN CO-CLINICAL TRIALS TO PREDICT TREATMENT RESPONSE IN TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERU24CA226110 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LEWIS, MICHAEL T., RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas RP220225Cancer Research UK C19221/A28683Cancer Research UK CTRQQR-2021\100010Division of Mathematical Sciences,United States NSF DMS 2436499NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260003NCI NIH HHS R01CA260003NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706NCI NIH HHS U24 CA226110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting hypoxia may enable personalized radiotherapy to improve outcomes through biologically guided dose modulation. To predict hypoxia status, we integrate advanced MRI methods-oxygen-enhanced MRI (OE-MRI) for hypoxia, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for perfusion and cellularity-with a mathematical model of radiation response. Data were collected before and during radiotherapy for 20 patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. MRI data were analyzed to derive parameters describing hypoxia, perfusion, and cellularity, clustering each tumor into four habitats at each time point. The model was calibrated using n-fold cross-validation to determine optimal parameters describing response over weeks 2 and 4 of radiotherapy in primary and nodal disease. Prediction accuracy was evaluated on unseen data using Pearson (PCC) and concordance correlation coefficients (CCC). Predictions for perfused hypoxic primary and nodal tumors showed strong correlation (PCC ranging from 0.74 to 0.77) and agreement (CCC ranging from 0.68 to 0.70). Using MRI-based habitats, the model accurately forecasts patient-specific tumor response, potentially supporting personalized radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Identifiers

PMID41991576
PMCPMC13357755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.