ArticleScientific reports2026
Soft computing models for predicting polymer viscosity across wide thermal and ionic-strength conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing polymer properties under varying thermal and ionic-strength conditions is crucial across diverse fields, from materials science to environmental engineering. While experimental techniques are effective, they are often time-consuming and costly, underscoring the need for rapid, reliable computational alternatives. This study evaluates the performance of various soft computing techniques, ranging from traditional machine learning methods (MLP, SVR, RF, GBM, LGBM, and XGB) to advanced deep learning approaches (CNNs), for predicting polymer viscosity under diverse temperature and salinity conditions. The models are trained on a curated database of 4,366 experimental measurements spanning ten commercially used polymers and wide ranges of molecular weight, polymer concentration, temperature, salinity, and shear rate. Using hold-out validation, 10-fold cross-validation, and a strict unseen-polymer test, all models achieve high accuracy (test R² ≥ 0.98), with LGBM and CNN providing the best overall performance. Compared with traditional models (MLP and SVR), these methods reduce test-set error metrics by approximately 25–30%, and the CNN attains R² = 0.997 on the unseen-polymer dataset. Permutation-importance analysis identifies polymer concentration as the dominant predictor, followed by shear rate and molecular weight, in agreement with established rheological behavior. The results demonstrate that ensemble and deep learning models can serve as fast, reliable surrogates for polymer viscosity across high-temperature and high-salinity conditions, reducing experimental effort and supporting data-driven optimization of polymer selection and operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.