ArticleScientific reports2026
A fusion deep Q-learning and particle swarm optimization algorithm for adaptive resource allocation in cloud computing circumstances.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective resource allocation in cloud computing continues a critical challenge due to dynamic loads, stringent service-level expectations, and the need to balance execution time, energy, and cost. This study suggests a hybrid framework that integrates Deep Q-Learning (DQL) with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to aid adaptive, multi-objective scheduling. DQL learns allocation strategies through interaction with the cloud environment, while PSO performs global search to refine action selection and accelerate convergence. Using Cloud Sim with real and synthetic workloads (Google Cluster, Planet Lab traces), the proposed method achieved a 35% reduction in average task execution time (from 245 s to 159 s) and a ~ 40% relative growth in resource utilization (from 60.1% to 84.6%), reduced SLA violations from 28 to 8, and lowered energy consumption to 6.3 kWh, outperforming standalone and hybrid models across 30 independent runs. Statistical tests (two-tailed t-test, α = 0.05) confirm significance. These results demonstrate that coupling reinforcement learning among swarm intelligence yields adaptive, high-quality decisions on behalf of real-time cloud resource scheduling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.