ArticleNPJ microgravity2026
Neurophysiological effects of partial gravity on bimanual control: a parabolic flight study.
Article in NPJ microgravity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bimanual coordination is essential for many spaceflight tasks, yet the effects of altered gravity on its behavioral and neural underpinnings remain unclear. This study examined the influence of microgravity (0 g) and partial gravity (0.25-0.75 g) on isometric bimanual coordination during parabolic flight. Participants performed rhythmic force tasks while force and electromyography (EMG) data were collected. Results indicated that mean force and force smoothness differed across gravity conditions, with the most pronounced behavioral impairments occurring in microgravity. Performance under partial gravity (0.25-0.75 g) generally trended toward the 1 g condition. At the neural level, exploratory EMG-EMG cross-wavelet analysis indicated reduced beta band (13-30 Hz) interlimb coordination in 0 g compared with 1 g, whereas traditional coherence measures did not show differences related to gravity. These neural findings should be interpreted cautiously and as exploratory rather than confirmatory. The findings suggest that the absence of gravitational loading is associated with the greatest challenges for coordinated motor output, while partial loading may help preserve performance. These results have implications for astronaut training and countermeasure development for future lunar and Martian missions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.