Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991381›Full record

ReviewUrologic oncology2026

Novel immunotherapies for prostate cancer.

George Mo, Vivek Narayan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George MoDivision of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Vivek NarayanDivision of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: vnarayan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training Program in Genomic MedicineT32HG009495 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Katherine L. Nathanson, Bogdan Pasaniuc · 2017 to 2026
$4.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG009495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the advent of the autologous dendritic cell-based vaccine, sipuleucel-T, in 2010, the clinical development of immunotherapeutic approaches in advanced prostate cancer has largely been lacking. Aside from the infrequent use of pembrolizumab immune checkpoint blockade in rare molecularly-selected patients, no further immune approaches have achieved regulatory approval. Numerous challenges exist that preclude successful clinical development, including an immunologically-excluded tumor immune microenvironment, off-target and/or inflammatory toxicities that narrow the therapeutic window, and limited durability of anti-tumor responses. Nevertheless, recent advances in drug design and cellular engineering have reinvigorated interest in novel immunotherapeutic approaches in prostate cancer. This review provides an overview of the current landscape of novel immunotherapy clinical development for prostate cancer, with a focus on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, T cell engagers, monoclonal antibodies, and cancer vaccine approaches that have produced promising early phase clinical data.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyProstatic NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesHumansMaleCancer VaccinesCancer vaccinesChimeric antigen receptor T cell therapyImmunotherapyProstate cancerT cell engagers

Identifiers

PMID41991381
PMCPMC13236090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.