Observational studyBMJ open2026
Assessment of paediatric vertebral body and canal dimension in the cervical spine considering the influence of ethnicity in a New Zealand cohort.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo define subaxial cervical spine vertebral body and canal dimensions in a paediatric cohort and to assess the influence of age and ethnicity.
designRetrospective radiological observational study.
settingSingle-centre tertiary level trauma care setting in New Zealand.
participantsCT scans of children under 18 years of age were reviewed. A total of 111 participants were included (63 New Zealand European (NZE) and 48 Māori). Patients with cervical spine pathology or deformity were excluded.
interventionsNot applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were anteroposterior and transverse vertebral body and spinal canal dimensions measured at the mid-pedicle level from C3 to C7. Secondary outcomes included canal-to-vertebral body (canal:VB) ratios. Associations with age and ethnicity were assessed using correlation analysis and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
resultsAbsolute vertebral body and canal dimensions were larger in NZE children compared with Māori. Canal:VB ratios were smaller in NZE children, reaching statistical significance at C7 (p=0.011). Age demonstrated a strong positive correlation with mean vertebral body anteroposterior diameter and a moderate correlation with canal:VB ratio. ANCOVA showed ethnicity (NZE) to be a significant predictor of vertebral body dimensions, particularly transverse diameter at C4-C6, while age had a lesser effect. Canal:VB ratios decreased with increasing age from C3 to C7, with low coefficients of determination indicating additional influencing factors.
conclusionIn this paediatric cohort, vertebral body dimensions were more strongly associated with age than spinal canal dimensions. Ethnicity was associated with modest differences in cervical spine morphology, particularly transverse vertebral body diameter. These findings suggest cervical spine development is multifactorial and may have implications for trauma assessment and spinal cord injury risk evaluation in adolescents. Further studies incorporating anthropometric and sex-specific variables are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.