Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991269›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Prefilled versus infused regional citrate anticoagulation during continuous renal replacement therapy on circuit lifespan: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Hongxia Zou, Fang Wang, Niroj Mali, Yingying Yang, Ling Zhang

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongxia Zou *Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Fang Wang *Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Niroj MaliDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yingying YangDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ling ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Research Institute, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China zhangling_crrt@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1155-4802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, regional citrate anticoagulation is the preferred strategy to maintain extracorporeal circuit patency. Current clinical practice relies on two citrate-based protocols, with the widely used but complex 4% trisodium citrate solution posing a hypernatraemia risk and haemofiltration replacement fluid of sodium citrate offering procedural simplification and a more physiological electrolyte profile. Direct prospective comparison of their circuit lifespan efficacy is currently unavailable. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, prospective, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be conducted in China. 90 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive anticoagulation with either citrate-based haemofiltration replacement fluid or 4% trisodium citrate solution, with all patients undergoing a standardised continuous venovenous haemofiltration protocol. The primary outcome is circuit lifespan, with a non-inferiority margin set at 2.43 hours. Secondary outcomes include the 72-hour circuit survival probability, duration of hospitalisation, and all-cause mortality rates at 28 and 90 days. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. (2025)1157). Any subsequent amendments must be submitted to the same ethics committee for further review and approval prior to implementation. Furthermore, the findings of this trial will be disseminated through presentations at relevant national and international conferences and via publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500106991.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsCitratesContinuous Renal Replacement TherapyChinaCritical IllnessHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnticoagulantsCitratestrisodium citrateClinical ProtocolsDialysisINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARENephrology

Identifiers

PMID41991269
PMCPMC13110567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.