ArticleBMJ open2026
Metformin use and the risk of incident osteoarthritis among individuals with diabetes: a register-based nested case-control study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the association between metformin use and incident osteoarthritis (OA) in people with diabetes and the impact of dosing.
designNested case-control study within a cohort of >1.4 million individuals from Sweden.
participantsParticipants were aged 35-80 years in 2005, without diabetes or OA. We identified persons with incident diabetes between 2006 and 2016 and excluded those with OA before the diabetes diagnosis and those with an incident OA diagnosis within 3 years of the diabetes diagnosis. Cases were defined as individuals with incident OA before 2020 and were matched with up to four controls without OA in the same period, by sex, diabetes duration, birth year (±1 year) and date of diabetes diagnosis (±180 days) using incidence density sampling. Metformin use before the index date (OA diagnosis) was the main exposure. Secondary exposures were quartiles of total metformin use (defined daily doses (DDD)) and duration-adjusted use (DDD/day), reflecting average daily use. We estimated risk ratios with 95% CIs using conditional logistic regressions, adjusted for age at diabetes diagnosis, education, immigration status and comorbidities. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Incident OA diagnosis in primary or specialist care (International Classification of Diseases codes M15-M19).
resultsWe identified 4007 cases and 14 111 controls. Any metformin use was not associated with OA risk (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.12). Results for higher total use (0.98 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.11)) and duration-adjusted use (0.92 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.07)) showed no or inconclusive associations.
conclusionsIn individuals with incident diabetes and no prior OA, metformin was not linked to a lower risk of developing OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.