Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41991248›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026

Salvage Full-Endoscopic Resection of Residual Giant Thoracic Disc Herniation After Transpedicular Decompression and Instrumented Fusion: Technical Note, Literature Review, and Supplemental Video.

Sanjay Konakondla, Shailen G Sampath, Albert E Telfeian, Jian Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanjay KonakondlaThe Endoscopic Spine Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA skonakondla@gmail.com.
Shailen G SampathColumbia Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Albert E TelfeianThe Endoscopic Spine Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Jian ShenThe Endoscopic Spine Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual giant thoracic disc herniations after open decompression are uncommon and present a significant surgical challenge, particularly in the setting of prior instrumentation and distorted anatomy. Here, the authors present a case of salvage full-endoscopic resection of a residual giant, centrally calcified thoracic disc herniation causing persistent spinal cord compression following prior transpedicular decompression and instrumented fusion. A 37-year-old woman presented with persistent thoracic pain, gait disturbance, and myelopathic symptoms after partial improvement from an initial open T6 to T7 transpedicular decompression with T6 to T8 fusion. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography demonstrated a residual giant calcified disc herniation at T6 to T7 with severe spinal cord compression and signal change. The patient underwent revision right-sided full-endoscopic thoracic discectomy using preoperative trajectory planning, docking on preserved osseous landmarks, ventral cavity creation, and controlled disc mobilization. The patient experienced rapid postoperative recovery with immediate resolution of thoracic pain and sustained improvement in gait and balance. This case demonstrates that full-endoscopic thoracic discectomy can be safely and effectively applied as a salvage technique to achieve spinal cord decompression in complex revision settings following failed open thoracic disc surgery.

Indexed as

revision endoscopic discectomyspinal cord decompressionthoracic disc herniation

Identifiers

PMID41991248
PMCPMC13153940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.