ReviewThe Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation2026
Utility of donor-derived cell-free DNA testing after lung transplantation in the precision medicine era.
Review in The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a validated, highly sensitive, plasma molecular biomarker of allograft injury after solid organ transplantation. Robust experiences with dd-cfDNA testing after kidney and heart transplantation have generated interest in this biomarker within the lung transplantation (LTx) community. A growing body of evidence now provides increased insight into dd-cfDNA utility for molecular monitoring of lung allograft health after transplantation. The expanding understanding of lung allograft injury to appropriately frame the advancing role of dd-cfDNA in the evolution of the diagnostic approach after LTx is described. Performance characteristics of both laboratory-based shotgun-sequenced testing from the Genome Transplant Dynamics (GTD) and Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation (GRAfT) consortia, as well as commercially available central lab-based algorithmic next-generation sequenced dd-cfDNA tests for lung transplant recipients (LTR) (AlloSure, CareDx and Prospera, Natera) are described. Kinetics of dd-cfDNA in LTRs over time, in multiple different clinical scenarios, from several investigator groups are aggregated. Phenotypes of lung allograft injury, such as acute lung allograft dysfunction and associated dd-cfDNA patterns and performance, are identified in alignment with established definitions and evolving molecular injury insights. Certain patterns of molecular injury that may predict long-term outcomes including chronic lung allograft dysfunction and mortality are examined. Lastly, clinical approaches to testing and interpretation of dd-cfDNA results in LTRs, a practical approach to using dd-cfDNA, and a rational framework for interpreting dd-cfDNA results in LTRs are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.