ArticleExperimental neurology2026
Deep cerebellar stimulation restores chronic motor deficits and loss of GABAergic neurons following sensorimotor cortex surgical brain injury in female rats.
Article in Experimental neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcquired brain injury, whether the result of trauma, stroke, or iatrogenic complications, may cause persistent motor and cognitive deficits with limited effective treatments. Recent studies suggest that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the lateral cerebellar nucleus (LCN) promotes long-term motor recovery after ischemic stroke and traumatic brain injury. Here, we examined the effect of LCN-DBS on motor recovery, and associated mechanisms, in an aspiration lesion model of surgical brain injury (SBI) in female rats.
methodsTen female Long-Evans rats underwent unilateral, catheter-assisted aspiration lesioning of sensorimotor cortex and DBS electrode implantation in the contralesional LCN. Three weeks post-SBI, rats were pseudo-randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups: SBI-sham DBS control (STIM-) and stimulation group (STIM+). The STIM+ group received 30 Hz LCN-DBS for six weeks. Motor performance was assessed pre- and post-SBI, as well as weekly during DBS, using the pasta matrix task, cylinder test, and horizontal ladder rung walking task. An additional five animals served as naïve controls for immunohistochemistry.
resultsThree weeks post-SBI, all lesioned animals demonstrated significant motor deficits. After six weeks of LCN-DBS, the STIM+ group demonstrated significant motor improvement compared to STIM- animals. IHC analysis revealed that STIM+ animals exhibited increased GAD67- and PV-positive GABAergic neurons compared to STIM- animals.
conclusionLCN-DBS promotes motor recovery following SBI, potentially by modulating GABAergic neurotransmission in perilesional cortex. These findings further support LCN-DBS as a promising therapeutic intervention for motor rehabilitation following SBI, particularly in female subjects who are underrepresented in neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.