ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Performance of LFSPRO prediction in TP53 mutation status for prospectively collected probands.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic counseling and testing for germline mutations are essential for identifying individuals at increased risk for cancer. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in TP53 are diagnostic of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), a highly penetrant disorder with diverse, early-onset tumors. Current clinical guidelines, such as Chompret and classic criteria, provide frameworks for identifying individuals at risk for P/LP TP53 variants; however, genetic counselors often encounter people with features concerning for LFS that do not clearly meet established criteria, creating challenges for risk assessment and testing decisions. We evaluated whether LFSPRO, a Mendelian, family-history-based model that estimates the individual's probability of harboring a deleterious TP53 variant, improves identification of individuals with LFS relative to guideline criteria. In a prospectively collected cohort of 178 probands who underwent clinical genetic counseling and germline TP53 testing, LFSPRO showed superior discrimination compared with Chompret criteria, with higher sensitivity (81% vs. 33%) and specificity (88% vs. 65%) and improved positive predictive values (PPVs: 0.53 vs. 0.14; negative predictive values [NPVs]: 0.96 vs. 0.85). Receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed strong discriminatory performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.88). Calibration analysis using observed-to-expected ratios indicated good agreement between predicted and observed P/LP variant frequencies (observed/expected = 1.07). These findings demonstrate that LFSPRO outperforms traditional guideline-based criteria for identifying individuals with TP53 mutations in real-world clinical settings. By providing quantitative, well-calibrated TP53 P/LP variant probabilities rather than binary classifications, LFSPRO can enhance genetic counseling and support testing decisions, particularly for individuals who do not clearly meet existing criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.