Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41990231›Full record

ArticleJournal of economic entomology2026

Farmed cricket performance remains stable over five generations of rearing on a waste-based diet.

Sophie Y Kasdorf, Susan M Bertram, Heath A MacMillan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan M Bertram
Heath A MacMillan

Funding

Canadian Foundation for Innovation 37721Canadian Space AgencyCanadian Space Agency. EquipmentDeep Space Food Challenge 22IUCCAR22Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2017-06263Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018-05322Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) S.M.B. (RGPIN-2017-06263) and H.A.M. (RGPIN-2018-05322)NSERC 568647-21NSERC Alliance Grant 568647-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmed insects like crickets offer a sustainable protein source to feed the growing global population. A benefit of cricket farming is the potential to use waste diets instead of unsustainable, expensive feeds. Brewer's spent grain is a nutritionally valuable organic waste product that has been used to rear crickets in single-generation studies. However, long-term effects of spent grain-based feeds are unclear, which makes incorporation into commercial feed risky for producers. We reared a farmed cricket Gryllodes sigillatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) for 5 generations on a high inclusion (75%) spent grain diet. Crickets reared on spent grain were 19% smaller at adulthood than crickets reared on farm feed, resulting in decreased yield (mass of crickets harvested), but were able to reproduce and had high survival rates. Cricket performance remained stable over 5 generations, indicating that spent grain contains adequate nutrition to support long-term cricket production. We also reared crickets on a gradual inclusion spent grain diet that increased from 15% to 75% spent grain over 5 generations. While this "weaning" approach did not improve cricket performance on high-inclusion spent grain diets, crickets on low inclusion diets (15%) displayed about a 40% increase in survival and yield compared to the control. Therefore, inclusion of low amounts of spent grain in cricket feed may not only be beneficial from an environmental and feed cost perspective, but also from a production yield perspective. Our findings are the first to show that spent grain could act as a feed ingredient for long-term rearing of farmed crickets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal HusbandryGryllidaeAnimalsDietEdible GrainFemaleMalebrewery wastecircular bioeconomygrowthmultigenerationaltransgenerational effect

Identifiers

PMID41990231
PMCPMC13268526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.