ArticleJournal of economic entomology2026
Farmed cricket performance remains stable over five generations of rearing on a waste-based diet.
Article in Journal of economic entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Farmed insects like crickets offer a sustainable protein source to feed the growing global population. A benefit of cricket farming is the potential to use waste diets instead of unsustainable, expensive feeds. Brewer's spent grain is a nutritionally valuable organic waste product that has been used to rear crickets in single-generation studies. However, long-term effects of spent grain-based feeds are unclear, which makes incorporation into commercial feed risky for producers. We reared a farmed cricket Gryllodes sigillatus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) for 5 generations on a high inclusion (75%) spent grain diet. Crickets reared on spent grain were 19% smaller at adulthood than crickets reared on farm feed, resulting in decreased yield (mass of crickets harvested), but were able to reproduce and had high survival rates. Cricket performance remained stable over 5 generations, indicating that spent grain contains adequate nutrition to support long-term cricket production. We also reared crickets on a gradual inclusion spent grain diet that increased from 15% to 75% spent grain over 5 generations. While this "weaning" approach did not improve cricket performance on high-inclusion spent grain diets, crickets on low inclusion diets (15%) displayed about a 40% increase in survival and yield compared to the control. Therefore, inclusion of low amounts of spent grain in cricket feed may not only be beneficial from an environmental and feed cost perspective, but also from a production yield perspective. Our findings are the first to show that spent grain could act as a feed ingredient for long-term rearing of farmed crickets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.