Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41990090›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Effect of a 3-week program of cane training and use on gait of individuals with Parkinson's disease: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jordana de Paula Magalhães, Merrill R Landers, Aline Alvim Scianni, Maria Eduarda Bueno Santos Ribeiro, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06950255 (Effect of a 3-week Program of Cane Training and Use on Gait of Individuals With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06950255 narecruitingnot on this map

Effect of a 3-week Program of Cane Training and Use on Gait of Individuals With Parkinson's Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of Minas GeraisRan2025 to 2026Enrolled26ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsCane, static stretching and health education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordana de Paula MagalhãesDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Merrill R LandersDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4234-910X
Aline Alvim ScianniDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Eduarda Bueno Santos RibeiroDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais FariaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough studies examining the immediate effects of cane use in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) have reported negative outcomes, the efficacy and safety of structured training programs for assistive device use remain to be investigated. Furthermore, the limited evidence regarding patient-reported outcomes hinders the implementation of patient-centered, evidence-based practices in prescribing assistive devices for this population.

objectiveTo investigate the effect of cane training and use on gait speed (primary outcome), gait confidence, cadence, step length, functional mobility, freezing of gait, fear of falls, and satisfaction with the use of a cane (secondary outcomes) in individuals with PD. MATERIALS AND

methodsA double-blind, randomized controlled trial will be carried out. A total of 26 individuals with PD will be randomly divided into two groups: (1) cane training and use (experimental group) or (2) global stretches and health education (time and attention controlled group). The intervention will be provided in four sessions lasting 40 minutes each, spaced over 15 to 22 days. Individuals will be instructed to use a cane (experimental group) or perform stretching exercises (time and attention-controlled group) daily, starting from the first day of training. Assessments will be conducted at the beginning of the study (week 0), post-intervention (week 3, post-intervention), and one month after the cessation of the intervention (week 8, follow-up). The primary outcome is gait speed. Secondary outcomes include gait confidence, cadence and step length, freezing of gait, functional mobility, fear of falls, and satisfaction with the use of cane. Between-group differences will be measured using a two-way repeated measures ANOVA, following intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches (α=0.05). DISCUSSION: The results of this study may improve the prescription of canes for individuals with PD. If effective, the cane could serve as a simple, low-cost, evidence-based intervention, and the training protocol could be replicated in clinical practice. CLINICAL

trial registrationEffect of Training and Use of Cane on Gait in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease - NCT06950255.

Indexed as

CanesExercise TherapyGaitParkinson DiseaseAccidental FallsAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41990090
PMCPMC13086423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.