Trial reportPLoS biology2026
Dopamine D2-receptor blockade in humans disrupts the effect of effort on learning.
Trial report in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans and other animals learn the value of candidate actions by interacting with their environment, which invariably requires the exertion of effort. Dopamine has been implicated in both effort and reward learning, but little is known about how these processes interact. In this double-blind study, healthy young adults (N = 42) were randomized to receive either high-dose sulpiride (a post-synaptic D2-receptor antagonist) or placebo. Participants then completed a novel two-armed bandit task, in which they weighed the effort costs associated with each option against their expected rewards. Overall, learning accuracy was lower on sulpiride compared to placebo. Computational modeling revealed that this was driven by the capacity of effort to significantly modulate learning rates on placebo but, critically, not on sulpiride. Simulations showed that the capacity of effort to modulate learning rates plays an adaptive role by improving performance in agents whose learning would otherwise be compromised by low motivation. Together, these data provide causal evidence that dopamine supports the relationship between effort and learning, and reveal a novel role for dopamine in shaping how humans learn from the consequences of their actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.