Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41990049›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Predictors of survival among cervical cancer patients in Swaziland (Eswatini): A population-based analysis in a resource-limited setting (2016-2024).

Sithembiso S Msibi, Citlalli Lopez, Fezokuhle N Khumalo, L Joseph Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sithembiso S MsibiO'Donnell School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0993-5966
Citlalli LopezO'Donnell School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Fezokuhle N KhumaloCenter for Global Health Practice and Impact, Georgetown University, Mbabane, Swaziland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9835-0065
L Joseph SuO'Donnell School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) has one of the highest prevalence rates of HIV at 25.4% and only recently implemented an HPV vaccine in 2023. The country also reported the highest incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer in 2021, estimated at 84.5 and 55.7 per 100,000 female population, respectively. This study serves as the first survival analysis of cervical cancer patients in Eswatini, aimed at examining the impact of clinical and demographic factors on cervical cancer survival outcomes. The Eswatini Cancer Registry was screened for cancer patients from 2016 to 2024, yielding a total of 2,349 cervical cancer patients, of whom 603 deaths were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The primary analysis assessed the association between cancer stage at diagnosis and survival, adjusting for potential confounders (age, smoking status, HIV status, treatment, and basis of diagnosis). Most patients (44.27%) were aged 50 years or older at diagnosis, whereas 31.42% were between 40 and 49 years and 24.31% were 39 years or younger. A significantly higher proportion of patients did not receive any treatment (59.05%, p < 0.001). Advanced cancer stages (Stages 3 and 4) were associated with significantly reduced survival times, with Stage 4 patients experiencing a median survival of about 10 months compared to about 40 months for Stage 1. Treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery) reduced the hazard of death by 30% (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84, p < 0.001). In this first population-based survival analysis of cervical cancer in Eswatini, advanced stage at diagnosis and lack of treatment emerged as the strongest predictors of mortality, consistent with evidence in survival of cancer patients. These findings highlight the urgent need to expand access to screening, ensure early detection, and strengthen treatment capacity.

Identifiers

PMID41990049
PMCPMC13086319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.