ArticlePloS one2026
The tip of the iceberg: Profiling cooling agents using computational approaches to inform tobacco regulatory science.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cooling agents (chemicals added to impart a cooling sensation) in tobacco products are receiving increased attention due to their use as menthol substitutes. However, detailed information on their chemical structures, physico-chemical properties, cooling activity, and human and ecotoxicity potential has not been compiled. Our goal was to profile cooling agents that could be used as menthol substitutes in tobacco products, along with descriptions of their cooling properties and estimated toxicological effects. First, we compiled a library of 228 cooling agents, including 180 unique two-dimensional (2-D) chemical structures based on a review of multiple public data sources (literature, invention patents, and public databases). The library includes chemicals with a "cool" and/or "mint" flavor profile as designated by the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA), chemicals reported to activate the cation channel transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) receptor, and/or chemicals with reported subjective perceived sensory cooling. Second, we classified the cooling agents into three main chemical skeletons using similar structural motifs and estimated their physico-chemical properties related to cooling attributes using Schrödinger Canvas software, including log octanol-water partition coefficient (LogKow), vapor pressure, and electrotopological state index. Third, to investigate the cooling agents' similarity to each other and to menthol, we applied an unsupervised machine learning algorithm (Knowledge Discovery by Accuracy Maximization [KODAMA]) and hierarchical clustering techniques and identified six clusters. Fourth, we compiled available perceived cooling intensity data. Fifth, we used models based on experimental and predicted data (EPA's web-based Hazard Comparison Module [HCM]) to estimate human health toxicity and ecotoxicity. Some cooling agents are associated with genotoxicity, developmental toxicity, skin irritation, and eye irritation, and pose toxicity to fish, algae, and invertebrates. Using this surveillance approach will help inform future tobacco regulatory decisions and policies by profiling chemicals used as cooling agents in tobacco products and those that pose potential health hazard concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.