ArticlePloS one2026
Optimization problem of bike-sharing system rebalancing based on dynamic pricing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bike-Sharing Systems (BSS) help address first- and last-mile travel challenges. As a limited public resource, the current pricing mechanism fails to fully exploit the service potential of bike-sharing or adequately capture heterogeneous user price sensitivity. We propose a Dynamic pricing-based Stochastic Demand-Response Optimization (DSDRO) method to address this gap. The method balances service fairness under varying demand stickiness while maximizing enterprise resource utilization. The DSDRO framework leverages spatiotemporal patterns in bike-sharing demand data and introduces a dynamic pricing model that differentiates user demand stickiness. This model is embedded in a two-stage allocation-rebalancing formulation. An improved Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm enhanced with Large-scale Neighborhood Search (PSO-LNS) is designed to solve the model, yielding the optimal bike allocation and dispatch routes at each node. Numerical experiments based on real operational data validate the proposed approach. Compared to a traditional genetic algorithm baseline, DSDRO increases expected revenue by 15.51% and net profit by 24.18% under identical resource conditions. An ablation study shows that dynamic pricing alone increases revenue by over 300% relative to fixed pricing, while the LNS component reduces rebalancing cost by 76.21% relative to pure PSO. Algorithm stability is confirmed through 10 independent runs, with all performance metrics exhibiting a coefficient of variation below 5%. These results suggest that DSDRO shows promise in improving the utilization of bike-sharing resources, though further validation across diverse operational contexts is needed before broader conclusions can be drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.