ArticlePloS one2026
A pilot randomized controlled trial of neuromodulation-augmented balance training in people with multiple sclerosis: STIM-Balance Protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07174973 (Innovative Approaches to Enhance Balance and Neuroplasticity in Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Innovative Approaches to Enhance Balance and Neuroplasticity in Multiple Sclerosis: Evaluating the Combined Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Visual Feedback Balance Training
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImpairments in balance control and falls are common problems for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), resulting in mobility limitations and reduced participation. Non-invasive neuromodulation techniques such as functional electrical stimulation (FES) and transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) have revealed promising results in improving motor functions in other neurological populations; however, their effects during task-specific balance training have not been investigated in PwMS.
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary clinical efficacy of neuromodulation-augmented balance training programs on balance, mobility, and neuroplasticity in PwMS (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07174973).
methodsTwenty-four ambulatory PwMS will be randomly assigned into three groups: (1) visual feedback balance training (VFBT) with sham stimulation, (2) VFBT with active (closed-loop) FES for the ankle muscles and sham TSS, and (3) VFBT with active FES and active (open-loop sub-motor-threshold) TSS at the lumbosacral enlargement. Participants in each group will complete 12 training sessions over six weeks. Feasibility, safety, and acceptability will be assessed through recruitment and adherence metrics, adverse-event monitoring, and semi-structured interviews guided by the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire-2. Performance-based measures of balance, mobility, and walking speed, as well as patient-reported outcomes of balance confidence, walking ability, and fear of falling will be recorded to assess the preliminary efficacy. Modulation in neural pathways excitability will be quantified by recording motor evoked potentials and spinal motor evoked potentials.
conclusionFindings will help to determine whether neuromodulation-augmented balance training is feasible, safe, and acceptable for PwMS and will guide the design of a future fully powered RCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.