Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989961›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Evaluating Experiences With the Newly Enacted Law on Assisted Suicide in Austria: Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study.

Klara Doppler, Tamina-Laetitia Vielgrader, Julia Fischer, Helene Mayer, Jana Marica Hluch, Marlene Walser, Sabine Parrag, Stefan Dinges, Karl Stöger, Thomas Wochele-Thoma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Klara Doppler *Department for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-5560
Tamina-Laetitia Vielgrader *Department for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0009-0003-9183-9206
Julia FischerDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7376-8385
Helene MayerDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0009-0007-9073-6546
Jana Marica HluchDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0009-0009-5037-6579
Marlene WalserDepartment of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Faculty of Law, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0007-0537-6962
Sabine ParragDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0009-0004-4466-0585
Stefan DingesDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7693-6484
Karl StögerDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-2910
Thomas Wochele-ThomaLudwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0813-5682
Maria Kletecka-PulkerDepartment for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna/Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, Hof 2.8, Vienna, 1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4901-7930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Austria has only recently established a legal framework for assisted dying. Individuals seeking assistance in suicide must navigate a multistage process that has been criticized for its complexity both for the individuals seeking assistance and for the health care and legal professionals involved in the procedure. Objective: To address the critical gap in empirical research that sheds light on the law's implementation and its impact on the lived experiences of those involved, as well as on the broader health care sector, we have designed an evaluation that examines the various perspectives of individuals seeking assisted suicide; their family members and other relatives; and all professionals specified in the legal framework-notably physicians, notaries and other relevant legal professionals, pharmacists, and psychologists. Methods: Our study uses an interdisciplinary approach that integrates theories, concepts, and methodologies from legal science, ethics, and social science. The legal and ethical components examine aspects of the Austrian legal framework, such as the legal foundations, moral implications, and ethical challenges involved in assisted dying. The main part of this study lies in its comprehensive social science section, which consists of 2 online cross-sectional surveys. The surveys assess sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge and understanding of the framework, encounters and experiences with assisted suicide, and reported need for support and information on the legalization of assisted suicide. In parallel, we are in the process of conducting semistructured in-depth interviews with (1) individuals seeking assistance in dying, (2) family members and other relatives of the individuals seeking assistance in dying, and (3) professionals mentioned in the legal framework (eg, physicians). Thematic analysis will be used to interpret the interview data. Results: The initial research proposal received approval from the University of Vienna Ethics Committee in November 2023. The legal and ethical analyses are ongoing. Recruitment for interview participants began in January 2024. In total, 49 participants have been interviewed as of February 2026. Given the novelty of the legislation and the limited practical experience to date, further interviews are scheduled until April 2026. Data collection for both surveys took place from June to October 2024. The final samples consisted of 239 medical and nursing directors and 304 physicians. Data analysis was completed in May 2025. Completion and dissemination of all study components are anticipated by the end of 2026. Conclusions: Our multiperspective evaluation aims to assess the framework on assisted suicide in Austria. By evaluating the perspectives of relevant key stakeholders, we aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the law's societal, legal, and ethical implications.

Indexed as

Suicide, AssistedAustriaCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesassisted dyingassisted suicideempirical researchend of lifeinterdisciplinary studieslegal aspectsmedical ethicssocial sciencesstakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID41989961
PMCPMC13086061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.