Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41989778›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Family Physicians' Views of Who They Are Accountable To and Current Quality Metrics.

Richard A Young, Sandra K Burge, Katherine S Bergs, Residency Research Network of Texas (RRNeT) Investigators group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard A YoungResidency Program, JPS Hospital Family Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas.
Sandra K BurgeDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio.
Katherine S BergsBehavioral Medicine in Primary Care, JPS Hospital Family Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas.
Residency Research Network of Texas (RRNeT) Investigators group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Primary care physicians are expected to demonstrate accountability for their work to health care administrators. Objectives: To determine family physicians' views about common approaches to demonstrate accountability to health care administrators and for physicians who desire changes, to ascertain those proposed changes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this qualitative study, semistructured focus group interviews were conducted from November 2021 to March 2024 in primary care offices of purposively sampled family physicians who concurrently saw patients in 5 different cities in Texas. Exposure: Interviewers queried participants about their views on existing accountability approaches by health care administrators and their views on improving accountability systems. Main Outcomes And Measures: Codebook thematic analysis identified themes characterizing participant views on demonstrating accountability to health care administrators, common quality metrics, and suggestions to improve accountability approaches. Results: Thirty-six participants were interviewed in 12 focus groups (15 [42%] were aged 31-39 years, 20 [56%] were female, and 20 [56%] were residency or medical school faculty). Significant themes included that participants were accountable to multiple stakeholders, and all stakeholders should be held equally accountable for their work. Existing quality metrics were perceived as useful tools to improve preventive and chronic disease goals for patient populations. Concerns about common quality metrics included that they sometimes contradicted patients' wishes, were sometimes inappropriate, were sometimes corrupted by erroneous data, expected the physicians to control patient behaviors they could not, and penalized physicians who care for vulnerable populations. Participants reported moral distress caused by tensions between the demands of the metrics vs patient-centric care and their professional duties. Many participants had suggestions for improvement for assessing the quality and accountability of their work. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of family physicians' beliefs about accountability and common quality metrics, no participant was fully satisfied with the existing approaches for family physicians to demonstrate accountability for their work to health care administrators. Based on their responses, 2 proposals were created for a better approach to primary care accountability: minor adjustments that preserve some of the existing systems and major changes that represent a paradigm shift in the use of metrics to evaluate the work of primary care physicians and teams.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysicians, FamilyQuality of Health CareSocial ResponsibilityAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchTexas

Identifiers

PMID41989778
PMCPMC13087814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.